Is Gender Passe?
Trans Non-binary Self and Other
Presented at the International Association of Analytic Psychology (IAAP) University of Vienna Aug 28, 2019
Jung theorizes that men have an inner feminine soul or “Other,” the anima which inspires him creatively while her shadow-side produces moodiness. An analogous unconscious archetype is theorized for women, but it’s unclear if the animus or masculine inner “Other” is her soul as it has a collective rather than individualistic nature, and can prompt her to act like a man which is contrary to her nature. But what is the true nature of man and woman? It’s a difficult question. For millennia woman has been defined by men as “other,” and her “true nature” declared without reference to the social-cultural realities of her status, degrees of liberty, opportunity and power. Until very recently in the West, woman has been the property of men and/or a sexual and reproductive object. Her subordination and denial of rights—human, social and economic—have been justified by religions and ideologies that posit woman as a lesser being.
Jung’s ideas about women and the feminine are more enlightened than most of his era. His anima/animus model of psyche with its polarized gender concepts was published in 1917, more than a decade before Western women were named “persons under law,” and theoretically permitted education, employment, inheritance, land ownership, leadership, professions and parental rights. A major theoretical weakness of Jung’s work, Rowland argues, is confusion of the biological with the psychological that can lead to false consciousness and adaptation to the normative rather than individuation.